McRitchie Studio

Extracted reusable studio-border-glow primitive; deployment cards now configure stage palettes. PR #415 updated with task URL, local preview, full-suite/rubocop fingerprint 45c792c9db4c, and CI green.

Scout report: conductor-review - Light review found the border glow primitive implementation code-clean for this task, but PR #415 is still draft and shared with blocked sibling deployment-rainbow-border, so Avi should reconcile readiness before reviewed. Reporter: alex Outcome: conductor-review Findings: - No code blockers: .studio-border-glow owns the masked border and halo pseudo-elements, while submitted/reviewed/assembled/release cards only configure CSS variables and stage palettes. - Reduced motion is handled at the primitive level by disabling animation on .studio-border-glow::before and ::after; submitted also remains non-animated through its stage variable. - Merge/admin gate: GitHub reports PR #415 mergeable with CI green, but isDraft=true, qa-intake labels it avi-ready-draft, and the same PR references blocked task deployment-rainbow-border. - Task DoR metadata gate: bin/dor-check border-glow-primitive reports stale full-suite/rubocop fingerprints for this task record, despite current PR CI being green. Questions: - none Checks: - [component] Inspected app/assets/tailwind/application.css and task/current-release views against primitive and deployment palette acceptance criteria. - [integration] curl -fsS http://localhost:3004/deployments confirmed studio-border-glow on confirming, submitted, reviewed, and assembled cards; /up returned 200. - [ci] gh pr checks 415 reports scan_ruby, scan_js, lint, and test all pass at current head e5c50682. - [merge-safety] git diff --check clean; git merge-tree origin/release origin/feat/deployment-rainbow-border produced a clean tree; no same-file overlap with other open release PRs.

Scout report: conductor-review - Code review found the border glow primitive extraction meets the UI acceptance surface, but the PR is still draft and dor-check rejects stale full-suite/rubocop task evidence despite green GitHub CI at the current head. Reporter: shannon Outcome: conductor-review Findings: - No code blockers: .studio-border-glow owns the ring, masked halo, animation, and reduced-motion disable; task/release stage classes now only configure palettes and opacity. - Operational gate: PR #415 is draft and bin/dor-check border-glow-primitive reports stale full-suite/rubocop fingerprints for the current PR head. - Merge safety: no open PR touches this CSS/partial/test file set; git merge-tree origin/release origin/pr/415 exits clean, though GitHub baseRefOid still points at older release 820bb766. Questions: - none Checks: - GitHub checks on PR #415 at e5c50682: lint, scan_js, scan_ruby, and test all pass. - Exact PR temp worktree: bin/rails test task_card/deployments_live_fx plus focused deployments tests passed, 2 selected runs and 50 assertions for the integration slice. - Exact PR temp worktree: bin/rails tailwindcss:build passed; git diff --check passed. - Local preview smoke: curl -fsSI http://localhost:3004/deployments returned 200, and earlier class smoke found studio-border-glow variants on the deployments page.

pr-review deferred border-glow-primitive: conductor-review. shannon: conductor-review - Code review found the border glow primitive extraction meets the UI acceptance surface, but the PR is still draft and dor-check rejects stale full-suite/rubocop task evidence despite green GitHub CI at the current head.; alex: conductor-review - Light review found the border glow primitive implementation code-clean for this task, but PR #415 is still draft and shared with blocked sibling deployment-rainbow-border, so Avi should reconcile readiness before reviewed.

Scout report: conductor-review - Implementation meets the border-glow primitive acceptance at PR head, but Avi should reconcile process readiness before reviewed because PR #415 is draft and this task's full-suite/rubocop evidence is stale after later shared-branch edits. Reporter: shannon Outcome: conductor-review Findings: - No code blocker found: .studio-border-glow owns ring, halo, keyframes, and reduced-motion stop; task/release cards configure stage palettes through CSS variables. - Merge/process issue: bin/dor-check border-glow-primitive rejects stale full-suite and rubocop fingerprints, while the same shared PR also carries submitted sibling randomized-glow-motion. Questions: - none Checks: - [component] bin/rails test test/views/task_card_test.rb test/views/deployments_live_fx_test.rb => 19 runs, 273 assertions, green - [integration] bin/rails test test/controllers/tasks_controller_test.rb -n '/current release gets animated border glow once confirming starts|deployments cards glow for deploy lane attention stages/' => 2 runs, 56 assertions, green - [build] bin/rails tailwindcss:build green; [smoke] curl http://localhost:3004/deployments found studio-border-glow/stage glow markers - [dor] bin/dor-check border-glow-primitive failed stale full-suite/rubocop evidence; [ci] GitHub PR #415 checks green; PR is draft

Both reviewers (Shannon primary + Carl light) APPROVE the code and acceptance — re-certification, NOT code rework. bin/dor-check RED: [full-suite]/[rubocop] certs fingerprint-STALE (bound to 45c792c9) vs PR head 95a41b10; final stack commits landed after the cert. GitHub CI fully green on head 95a41b10. Re-cert at head: bin/full-suite-check border-glow-primitive then bin/dor-check border-glow-primitive back-to-back, then resubmit. Optional polish while you re-touch (NON-blocking): the reduced-motion accessibility gate is implemented correctly in CSS but only indirectly tested — add assert_includes css, 'prefers-reduced-motion' so the gate is asserted directly, not via the submitted variant's animation:none var.

Resolved recert blocker: ran bin/full-suite-check on current PR #415 head, recorded f887e67b cert, and DoR is green.