McRitchie Studio

Scout report: conductor-review - Light review found the border variant implementation and current-head checks green; PR #415 remains draft, so Avi/primary should clear that administrative merge gate before reviewed. Reporter: carl Outcome: conductor-review Findings: - No code blockers: submitted uses a green single-color border/halo, reviewed uses yellow/blue, assembled and release-confirming keep rainbow, and reduced motion disables pseudo-element animations. - Merge safety: branch is based on release, PR is mergeable, and both primary plus PR worktrees are clean; PR #415 is still draft. Questions: - none Checks: - [component] documented Ruby PATH bin/rails test test/views/task_card_test.rb test/views/deployments_live_fx_test.rb (17 runs, 224 assertions) - [integration] documented Ruby PATH bin/rails test test/controllers/tasks_controller_test.rb -n deployments-cards-glow filter (1 run, 21 assertions) - [build] documented Ruby PATH bin/rails tailwindcss:build - [smoke] curl -fsS http://localhost:3004/deployments includes submitted/reviewed/assembled glow classes - [ci] PR #415 head b95464c GitHub scan_ruby, scan_js, lint, and test all pass; PR is draft

Scout report: conductor-review - Code review is green, but PR #415 is still draft and also references blocked sibling task deployment-rainbow-border; Avi should reconcile readiness before advancing. Reporter: shannon Outcome: conductor-review Findings: - No code blocker: CSS adds submitted green single-color border/halo, reviewed yellow-blue gradient, rainbow assembled/release border, and reduced-motion animation shutdown. - Merge safety snag: GitHub reports PR #415 mergeable CLEAN with CI green, but isDraft=true and qa-intake labels it avi-ready-draft. - Workflow snag: PR body and task metadata also link blocked task deployment-rainbow-border, so one PR is shared by a submitted task and a blocked task. - No same-file overlap found with other open release PRs; this PR only changes app/assets/tailwind/application.css and test/views/task_card_test.rb. Questions: - none Checks: - [component] Homebrew Ruby bin/rails test test/views/task_card_test.rb test/views/deployments_live_fx_test.rb -> 17 runs, 224 assertions, green - [integration] Homebrew Ruby bin/rails test test/controllers/tasks_controller_test.rb -n /deployments cards glow for deploy lane attention stages/ -> 1 run, 21 assertions, green - [build] Homebrew Ruby bin/rails tailwindcss:build -> green, worktree remained clean - [smoke] curl -fsS http://localhost:3004/deployments and /up -> 200 - [dor] bin/dor-check deployment-border-variants -> DoR met; GitHub CI 4/4 green

pr-review conductor-review defer: code review is green, but PR #415 is still a DRAFT and references blocked sibling task deployment-rainbow-border. Mark the PR ready (gh pr ready 415) and reconcile/clear the sibling dependency before it can advance to reviewed. Not blocked; stays submitted for the next review wave.

Scout report: request-changes - Light review found the CSS primitive, but the submitted single-color path can still render non-green border/shadow and the shared draft PR is not DoR/merge-ready. Reporter: carl Outcome: request-changes Findings: - BLOCKER: Submitted cards get the green studio-border-glow gradient in CSS, but app/views/tasks/_task_card.html.erb lines 33-72 still drive --task-card-glow-color, border-color, and box-shadow from mascot/fallback colors; the tests assert #6390F0, so the single-color variant is not guaranteed green border+halo. - BLOCKER: Merge safety is red: PR #415 is draft/shared with blocked sibling tasks, qa-intake marks it needs-agent merge=UNSTABLE/behind release, and bin/dor-check deployment-border-variants rejects stale full-suite/rubocop proof with GitHub test still pending. Questions: - none Checks: - [component] inspected refs/remotes/origin/pr-415 CSS/view/test diff; reduced-motion CSS disables studio-border-glow animations, reviewed yellow/blue gradient exists, submitted green gradient exists but inline card shadow remains non-green. - [integration] curl -fsS http://localhost:3004/deployments returned 200; rendered submitted card carried task-card-stage-glow-submitted studio-border-glow but inline --task-card-glow-color was #f59e0b. - [merge-safety] bin/dor-check deployment-border-variants failed; gh pr checks 415 has lint/scan pass and test pending; bin/qa-intake --refresh --apps mcritchie-studio marks PR #415 needs-agent.

Scout report: request-changes - Single-color submitted border/halo is not consistently green, and PR #415 is not merge-ready. Reporter: shannon Outcome: request-changes Findings: - BLOCKER: app/views/tasks/_task_card.html.erb still drives submitted card border-color and box-shadow from mascot/fallback --task-card-glow-color, so the single-color variant can render non-green border/shadow despite the green primitive gradient. - BLOCKER: PR #415 is draft, includes building task randomized-glow-motion plus blocked sibling tasks, and dor-check rejects stale full-suite/rubocop evidence while GitHub test remains in progress. Questions: - none Checks: - [component] Inspected current PR head d2c0ccc CSS/ERB/tests for submitted, reviewed, assembled, release, and reduced-motion border variants. - [integration] curl -fsS http://localhost:3004/deployments returned 200; rendered submitted cards carried studio-border-glow but inline --task-card-glow-color was non-green. - [merge-safety] git merge-tree origin/release origin/feat/deployment-rainbow-border produced a clean tree; open PR scan found no same-file overlap, but qa-intake marks PR #415 needs-agent.

pr-review blocked review: shannon: request-changes - Single-color submitted border/halo is not consistently green, and PR #415 is not merge-ready.; carl: request-changes - Light review found the CSS primitive, but the submitted single-color path can still render non-green border/shadow and the shared draft PR is not DoR/merge-ready.

Addressed blocker: submitted deployment cards now force green single-color glow variables; PR #415 is ready, clean, and CI/DoR green at 95a41b10.

Both reviewers (Shannon primary + Carl light) APPROVE the code and acceptance — re-certification, NOT code rework. bin/dor-check RED: [full-suite]/[rubocop] certs fingerprint-STALE (bound to f887e67b) vs PR head 95a41b10; final stack commits landed after the cert. GitHub CI fully green on head 95a41b10. No code change needed. Re-cert at head: bin/full-suite-check deployment-border-variants then bin/dor-check deployment-border-variants back-to-back, then resubmit.

Resolved recert blocker: current PR #415 head 95a41b10 has fresh full-suite/RuboCop cert f887e67b and DoR is green.